Optimizer

Make the prompt do the work

A judgement call or a diagnosis where you need to see the reasoning, not just the answer.

Your current prompt

**Context**
My deck on {{deck_topic}} was built for a longer slot and the meeting has just been cut to {{new_time_limit}}. Cutting slides in the order they currently appear removes context the later slides depend on, and cutting proportionally across every section leaves every point half-made instead of some points fully made. The goal is to preserve the argument's spine, not its length.

**Problem**
Decide which slides survive the cut to {{new_time_limit}} by analyzing each slide's dependency on prior slides, its contribution to the core recommendation, and its cost if omitted versus summarized aloud.

**Reasoning Steps**
1. Identify the spine: trace the minimum sequence of slides that carries the decision from problem to recommendation without any slide the audience could not reconstruct on their own.
2. Classify every remaining slide as SUPPORT, meaning it strengthens the spine but is not load-bearing, or CONTEXT, meaning it is background the audience likely already has, since these two classes are cut in different orders.
3. Estimate verbal-substitution cost: for each SUPPORT slide, determine whether its content can be said aloud in one sentence without the visual, which makes it cuttable even if its content stays in the room.
4. Fit to the clock: allocate roughly one minute per spine slide and confirm the spine alone fits inside {{new_time_limit}}, adding back SUPPORT slides only if time remains.
5. Synthesize: produce the final slide list in presentation order, and name the single SUPPORT slide most likely to be asked about anyway so it can be held in reserve as backup.

**Expected Output**
- A per-slide analysis tagging each original slide SPINE, SUPPORT, or CONTEXT with the reason
- A categorized report giving the final slide list for {{new_time_limit}}, the cut list, and the backup list held in reserve
- A final recommendation for the verbal bridge sentence that replaces each cut SUPPORT slide
- The flip threshold: the question from the room that would force a held-in-reserve slide back into the deck mid-meeting

Template · 2 variables

2 of 2 still blank. Anything left blank is sent to the model as {{placeholder}}.

Describe your ideal output (optional)

ModeModel

4 blocks · 3 clarifying questions · Auto rotates through the models your plan unlocks, switching every two runs per mode.

⌘ + Enter

Reasoning frame

What you will get back

01Context
The situation plus the domain mechanics that make it non-trivial (funding rates, CME closure, the Peltzman effect). Ends on the meta-goal — "data-driven, not emotional"; "root-cause first, then adjust".
02Problem
One sentence. "Evaluate / Identify … by analyzing <a, b, c, d>" or "… and provide a framework for diagnosing which …".
03Reasoning Steps
Exactly five, numbered. Each reads "Verb the thing: what to determine and why." Hypothesis-per-step for a diagnostic; factor-per-step for a decision. The fifth step is always a synthesis step.
04Expected Output
Bulleted: the per-factor analysis, a categorized report, a final recommendation, and the single "flip" threshold that would reverse that recommendation.

Plus 3 clarifying questions you can answer to re-run with more facts.